De-Lurking on the Net

May 7, 2017

Curse of being a Pakistani

In this countries ranking survey website Pakistani passport comes at the at 92 and Afghanistan at 93 out of 159 countries. The website also tells which countries offer free visa travel and which countries need visas or electronic visa for which passport. Pakistanis are the ones leaving in droves to settle abroad mostly as economic migrant. But sometimes they are running away from torture, false accusation of blasphemy or simple discriminations as being minority. Though, in many countries, Pakistanis get discriminated, denied the refuge and often deported but the exodus of muslims, non-muslims from Pakistan continues unabated. This article in Herald Dawn newspaper of Pakistan

The perils of Pakistani migrants heading to Europe

is pretty detailed and apt. No doubt terrorism of Pakistan has been headache for the world. Though it is far less now in spite of having a recent spike and upsurge which is since abated and gone. Minorities along with muslims,  genuine Pakistanis all suffer. But what was the reason for  British to unleash the curse of Pakistan onto the world or why those Muslims who lived in that part were demanding a land of pure, a land for salvation and everlasting happiness knowing full well the support for Pakistan was coming from feudals, Nawabs (the Indian Lords)  etc who would have wanted to safeguard their interests in post-independence Pakistan. Why were the Muslims trying to run away from competing with Hindus on education, jobs, businesses and seeking refuge under the religious umbrella.

British, on their part, it is claimed wanted to carve out Pakistan to have a foot in the door to stop USSR and Pakistan came about as Muslim League assured to provide the base for UK(and by default all of West) whereas the Indian National Congress denied giving this access to anyone post independence. Hindus on their part before independence were still living in dark ages believing in untouchability (particularly wanted to be away generally in making any social contacts with Muslims or  Dalits). This strong feeling in Hindus, even though it is still not gone away fully yet but their divisions or old habits, prejudices etc are melting away and largely Indians including Muslims, Dalits etc have become more homogenous now after many reforms since independence like Hindu Undivided Family Laws where females inherit wealth on par with males, Reservations, Disbursement of lands to those cultivating and eliminating privy purses to ex-rulers(Maharajas) as well as eliminating large landholdings etc-2.

Hassan Nissar is  a veteran journalist who lives in Pakistan but in one TV conversation here,  I heard him describing the formation of Pakistan happened  due to meanness  of Indian National  Congress and its leader of that time not accepting the demand of Muslim league which was seeking confederation and separate electorate for Muslims.

  1.  
Nissar could not come out of his partiality for Mr Jinnah. He says Pt Nehru was midget in front of Mr Jinnah. Really! What makes him say that. Did Mr Jinnah  have vision for India, Pakistan or even Muslims?
Did Pt Nehru have vision for India? Yes Pt Nehru did have a vision as he wanted India to have strong centre? Why was strong centre needed? It was needed so that India ‘s parts were not usurped by outsiders like East  India Company  did in the past to India as it was having a weak centre then. A weak centre would have meant that centre like in the past would not be able to help any part that gets in trouble due to external imperialist/expansionist power attack. So, accepting the idea of confederation was becoming difficult for Pt Nehru. He  could also see  bringing in socialist upliftment of Masses. He could think of India ‘s  development on the lines of 5 years plans of USSR where USSR grew rapidly under those plans. These visions also entailed bringing in heavy industrial development, dams building, science education etc and of course he wanted to stablise the country post the partition trauma.
Now, let us see what vision did Mr Jinnah impart to the newly born nation Pakistan in the year after ’47 until his death in ’48.  Did Mr Jinnah  ever mention that he wanted to smash the feudalism and bring equality of masses. No, because Pakistan was born due to feudals giving support to Jinnah for making Pakistan. So, how could he turn his back on them. This was also one reason the Kashmiri secular leader Sheikh  Abdullah did not see the Kashmir ‘s destiny in Pakistan. Did Mr Jinnah think of safeguarding non-Muslims like Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, Jews, Ahmedies etc. So,  did Mr Jinnah bring in any protection law for them. He was busy usurping Baluchistan, busy sending raiders in Kashmir in spite of signing stand-still agreement with Maharaja. To this day, his policy of Kashmir is followed avidly by Pakistan. He was busy dismissing the elected govt  of NWF( present day KPK). He was busy seeking aid from USA and was ready to do anything for them (yet Pakistani loaths USA). He was busy lecturing Bengalis that Bangla language does not matter, it does not help integration and you have to give it up to become a proper Pakistani. Was he even thinking of making constituent assembly for making constitution. He was busy sidelining the persons he had used like Suhrawardy, Jogendra Nath Mandal(This chap was not Muslim enough to be taken into confidence on Kashmir etc). Jinnah was the biggest con artist even for Muslims as before the partition and after he was using these people and others, inciting many many others including Ambedkar, South Indians like Periyar (to seek Dravidistan) Nizam, Nawab of Junagadh to seek separation from India. He was telling Muslims that they can’t  live with Hindus as Muslim God or inspirations are different,  Muslim’s language is different, or culture is different. But soon after partition Mr Jinnah  was parroting the songs of secularism(his 11th Aug speech), which Congress was talking about all along before or after the partition. Did Mr Jinnah ever write a book or leave any notes that you could have a look at his vision before or after partition. No, he did not leave anything behind. Nehru on the other hand had written books on which you can judge him even today for his vision. In 1938, Nehru was appointed the chairman of planning by Mr SC Bose(famous revolutionary leader who sought help from Japan, Germany to bring down Brtitish) on the recommendation of famous Indian scientist Meghnad Saha. So, it is no wonder, Pakistanis remain confused to this day about Mr Jinnah, the con artist  if he was secular or was a hard core Muslim. Mr Jinnah had believed in confederation when he was negotiating with the Congress but not when he was usurping Baluchistan and trying to capture Kashmir or integrating NWFP. He was not thinking about democracy being driven in Pakistan from Bengal as at that time East Pakistan or Bengal was the most populous state in erstwhile Pakistan. He was not thinking of making Dhaka, the capital of Pakistan or imposing Bengali language on the rest of the Pakistanis. Though, Jinnah had no qualms imposing Urdu on Bengali people.
So, this man had no consistent principles and no vision of driving down democracy or equality, development, security of people in Pakistan. He is the reason Muslims are divided into three and not because of ‘Congress ki Kaminagi’ (or meanness of Congress) as Nisar seems to suggest in that chat when he fails to see the hypocrisy of Mr Jinnah. Mr Jinnah was the one asking for separate Muslim electorate before partition to safeguard the Muslims interests but he was not thinking of safeguarding any Hindu interests in Pakistan post independence. Elimination of Hindus was still going on fullscale in both Eastern and Western wings while Mr Jinnah was running Pakistan. Mr Jinnah is the reason bulk of the Pakistani Muslims are exploited and  trapped in endemic poverty in present day Pakistan as the feudals lord over everyone in concert with the Army, Mullahs and few prominent families.  Everybody else Hindus, Christians etc (including minority Muslims too) are suffering too along with them and  the law of blasphemy is the one that defines today’s Pakistan and is used against all specially the minorities. So, who was the midget Mr Nissar again? Mr Jinnah or Pt Nehru? It is hard to believe that Mr Nissar, who can read and analyse virtually all things very well can not see that Mr Jinnah was full of contradictions. Perhaps his love for Mr Jinnah blinds him so much as not to acknowledge the faults of Mr Jinnah. I do not know, if one would call Mr Jinnah conniving or duplicitous in saying one thing and believing in completely opposite but this (being duplicitous) has become Pakistan leaders’ national character. Can anyone trust anyone?

March 6, 2013

Was Partition a blessing in disguise – A travel from Akhand Bharat to Akhandit Hindu Samudaay

Amidst the gathering gloom about imploding Pakistan, I came across a positive news from Pakistan. It said Pakistan carried out drone attacks in Feb: US Officials . Well, isn’t it a surprise when many Pakistan political leaders were deriding US drone attacks for killing innocent civilians along with terrorists and wanted it to be stopped, that establishment in Pakistan realised that with US departure, now Pak army has to do what US was doing all along. Well, other news emerging from that country seem all depressing. A third major attack within last 2 month on Shia community and the news that part of the Pakistan state is now controlled by outside fighters not just in FATA etc but within its biggest city Karachi itself is hugely depressing. The Shia community is new target. Earlier targets for attacks have been other religious minorities like Hindu, Christian. The puzzle now seems who will follow Shias. Will it be Barelvis, Muhajir (Muslim migrants from India who came at Pakistan creation), will it be Punjabi v rest Pukhtuns, Sindhis etc. Baluchi like Shia are already on the anvil getting hammered.

Shia Massacre

Figure 1 After the Shia Bombing in Pakistan

Every time, all these bad news gather pace, the question goes back to the genesis of Pakistan. Was it necessary to placate and encourage a few Muslims by British to create a partition of India. The present affairs of Pakistan seems uncontrollable but who knows if more resources come into Pakistan, it may stabilise. There seems more if statements and wishful thinking about it, though.

Recently, I came across a facebook Hindu group page wanting to besmirch the good memory of Mahatma Gandhi decided to post a picture of Gandhi’s killers. The others were supposed to fall in line and pay respect to the killer because it would have meant rejecting Gandhi’s love for Muslims, Hindus etc. I was not happy for them losing sight of Gandhi’s contribution in India’s freedom as well as inspiring others like Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr. etc for the world peace in general.The group photo had included unfortunately another individual called “Veer Savarkar” who spent considerable years  in jail from (1911 -1924)  for violent struggle against British.  Savarkar was a complex person. In jail, he turned to revive Hinduism and wrote several books.  In 1920, the Indian National Congress and leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, Vithalbhai Patel and Bal Gangadhar Tilak demanded his unconditional release. Savarkar tactically signed a statement endorsing the trial, verdict and British law, and renouncing violence, a bargain for freedom. But his incarceration continued. After his release, however, in stead of joining India’s non-violent freedom movement with Congress, he went against the Congress and Jinnah’s Muslim League. He, presided over a new organisation till 1943  called Hindu Mahasabha which became a pre-cursor to current BJP (Bhartiya Janta Party). Hindu Mahasabha could not reconcile to partition. Gandhi was considered guilty as he acquiesced to partition. It is hard for anyone to conclude those days in 1948 that Veer Savarkar had nothing to do with Gandhi’s murder,  if he was sitting in that photo along with Gandhi’s eventual killers and met the killer just before the murder mission. So, Savarkar was also arrested for Gandhi’s murder too along with others but he was freed  as the evidence linking him with it lacked independent corroboration. Current BJP brigade keep bringing Veer Savarkar in front because  of their need to highlight his message of Akhand Bharat (undivided India) and also for his so much work on Hinduism.  Savarkar was a patriot to the core and devoted to the cause of India. I believe he should be brought to lime light denied to him so far but BJP should not dismiss Gandhi’s contribution and spoil his memory as  it was not just Savarkar who gave the message of Hindu unity and empowerment but Gandhi too did the same in equal measure, if not more.

Savarkar (above) and Gandhi politely agreed to...

Savarkar (above) and Gandhi politely agreed to disagree on whether Ramayana justified the use of violence in freedom struggle. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

BR Ambedkar, the man responsible for Indian Constitution, talked about Savarkar like this –

“In his scheme a Muslim is to have no advantage which a Hindu does not have. Minority is to be no justification for privilege and majority is to be no ground for penalty. “

Savarkar also expressed joy at the recognition of the claim of Jewish people to establish an independent Jewish state, and likened the event to the glorious day on which Moses led them out of Egyptian bondage.

However, there is a concern in majority Hindus that the current Congress and many other parties in India like SP, BSP, TMC(Trinamul Congress), AIADMK etc  who all want Muslim votes are doing the same thing that led to partition of India. It was  then the active appeasement of Muslim constituency  by British. The appeasement of any section of society lead to disenchantment in others. Already the reservations for even Hindu lower castes(dalits etc) is causing this. This has been extended  to Muslim reservation in number of states but if Muslim reservation for Jobs etc goes nationwide,  it will exacerbate into a deep seated anger against the beneficiaries and divide the communities along religious lines too besides already castes divided Indians. So, while most Indians thinking nostalgically about Pakistan hurts in one way asking question as to why we had to separate or why this dream of Savarkar ‘s  Akhand Bharat could not be kept, I have begun to feel and thank God for partition that India is saved at least from the mayhem (daily bombs) that Pakistan is facing. The Hindu community swelled after migration from Pakistan, perhaps, they must be feeling blessed too that they have become now an Akhandit Hindu Samudaay (undivided Hindu Community). However, it is not just Hindus, but Muslims feel relieved too. Here there is one Shia Muslim expressing his joy on remaining in India .He commented on the Pakistani news paper Dawn’s website like this –

Javed Hussaini

  February 17, 2013 7:13 pm

So much for the two nation theory, Maulana Azad was 100% right, I am glad my parents stayed put in India and not move to Pakistan, on the eve of partition. Being a Shia , and a minority in India, I feel much safer in Haryana, a 90% Hindu area where I live, then I ever will in a Muslim nation. Pakistan needs to learn to respect people and be tolerant, if the Hindus want they can wipe out Muslims from India and the world would probably do nothing , as it is a big economic power on which no military or economic sanctions will work, but that does not happen in India, periodic riots do happen that is as much a fault of Muslims and Hindus or Sikhs, Our MLA is a Muslim, the next constituency the MLA is a Sikh, and again the population of both communities is less then 10%. I hope that this venom from Pakistan does not spread to Muslims in India, already we have seen anti Shia violence in Lucknow.

Well, I hope India remains undivided between castes, groups and religions for long long time irrespective to whatever is happening in Pakistan.It was a blessing in disguise that partition happened. India should survive to give refuge to any one undergoing persecution anywhere.

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: